Thompson

(PC) Black v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 7, 20222:21-cv-02167California3,190 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RANDY LAMAR BLACK, No. 2:21-cv-02167-TLN-EFB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 P. THOMPSON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is a federal prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil action. The court 17 screened plaintiff’s original complaint on August 5, 2022 and dismissed it with leave to amend 18 for failure to state a cognizable claim. ECF No. 32. Plaintiff has filed an amended complaint, 19 which is before the court for screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A.1 ECF No. 34. Also before the 20 court are plaintiff’s motions for appointment of counsel (ECF Nos. 35 & 36), request for review 21 of his case by the assigned district judge (ECF No. 36) and motion for a preliminary injunction 22 ordering defendant Allred to provide him with medical care (ECF No. 35). 23 1 Plaintiff attempted to supplement his amended complaint by way of filings that he has 24 labeled “motion to enter evidence” and a “motion to support claim.” …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.