Rice

Rice v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20222:21-cv-01519California6,767 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 1] 12 Tawanna Rice, et al., No. 2:21-cv-01519-DAD-KJN 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 Kimberly-Clark Corporation, a Delaware 16 corporation, 17 Defendant. 18 19 Plaintiffs Tawanna and Kelly Rice bring this putative class action claiming defendant 20 | Kimberly-Clark Corporation, the manufacturer and distributor of Huggies Snug and Dry diapers, 21 | violated state consumer protection laws. Defendant moves to dismiss. For the reasons below, the 22 | motion is denied as to plaintiffs’ consumer fraud claims and granted in part as to plaintiffs’ 23 | claims for equitable relief, with leave to amend. The court also strikes all references in the 24 | operative complaint to marketing outside of that appearing on defendant’s Amazon.com 25 | storefront, but grants plaintiffs leave to amend.!

' The court notes this case has been randomly reassigned to District Judge Dale A. Drozd. Because the undersigned heard the motion addressed by…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.