Fite

Fite v. Sysco Sacramento, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20222:21-cv-01633California598 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GLEN FITE, individually, and on behalf of No. 2:21-cv-01633 DAD AC all others similarly situated,, 11 Plaintiff, 12 PROTECTIVE ORDER v. 13 SYSCO SACRAMENTO, INC., a 14 Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16 17 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties’ Stipulated Protective Order (ECF No. 30), is 18 APPROVED and INCORPORATED herein. 19 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT: 20 1. Requests to seal documents shall be made by motion before the same judge who will 21 decide the matter related to that request to seal. 22 2. The designation of documents (including transcripts of testimony) as confidential 23 pursuant to this order does not automatically entitle the parties to file such a document with the 24 court under seal. Parties are advised that any request to seal documents in this district is governed 25 by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 141. In brief, Local Rule 141 provides that documents may only 26 be sealed by a written order of the court after a specific request to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.