Doe

Doe v. Adams

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 8, 20221:21-cv-01103California3,125 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NICOLE RAMOS, Case No. 1:21-cv-01103-JLT-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING STIPULATED MOTION

TO REOPEN DISCOVERY AND MODIFY

v. SCHEDULING ORDER

JANEL ESPINOZA, et al., (ECF No. 53)

Defendants.

16 I. INTRODUCTION This action was filed on July 20, 2021. (ECF No. 1.) On March 4, 2022, a scheduling order issued, setting a nonexpert discovery deadline of July 5, 2022. (ECF No. 44.) On Friday, July 1, 2022, the parties filed a stipulated motion to modify the scheduling order. (ECF No. 49.) On July 5, 2022, the Court granted the parties’ motion, and modified the scheduling order. (ECF No. 50.) The Court extended the nonexpert discovery deadline until October 12, 2022, and continued the pretrial conference and trial dates in this matter. (Id.) Currently before the Court is the parties’ stipulated motion to reopen discovery and further modify the scheduling order, filed on November…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.