(PC) Hammler v. Johnson

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:22-cv-01252-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO FILE

LENGTHY COMPLAINT AND

12 v. DIRECTING THAT PLAINTIFF SHOW

CAUSE WHY HIS APPLICATION TO

13 REGINA JOHNSON, et al., PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

SHOULD NOT BE DENIED AND HE BE

14 Defendants. DIRECTED TO PAY THE ENTIRE FILING

FEE

15 ECF Nos. 2 & 5 16

17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, brings this section 1983 action and, concurrently, has applied to 21 proceed in forma pauperis, ECF No. 5. He is, however, a “three-striker” within the meaning of 22 Title 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).1 He may only proceed in forma pauperis if he shows that he is within 23 1 See, e.g., Hammler v. Dignity Health, No. 1:20-cv-1778-JLT-HBK (PC), 2021 U.S. Dist. 24 LEXIS 230439, at *10-13 (E.D. Cal. Dec. 1, 2021); Hammler v. California, No. 1:20-cv-00630- DAD-GSA (PC), 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 81763, at *1-8 (E.D. Cal. May 8, 2020); Hammler v. 25 Diaz, No. 1:20-cv-0488-JLT (PC), 2020…