Spearman

(PC) Rios v. Spearman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20221:19-cv-01009California3,934 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ISRAEL RIOS, Case No. 1:19-cv-1009-ADA-HBK (PC) Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S

THIRD AMENDED COMPLAINT

v. (Doc. No. 36) NP JOSEPH DRAGON, MD

NADKUMAR RAVI,

15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Israel Rios, a prisoner, initiated this action proceeding in forma pauperis by filing a pro se civil rights complaint filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 30, 2022, Plaintiff, assisted by counsel, filed a third amended complaint. (Doc. No. 36, “TAC”). Plaintiff’s TAC is subject to screening under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds the TAC states cognizable claims and will direct service of process by separate order. I. BACKGROUND A. Procedural Posture Plaintiff’s initial complaint named multiple defendants from at least three different correctional institutions, Spearman, Warden at High Desert State Prison; Stuart Sherman, Warden at Substance Abuse and Treatment Facility;…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.