Griffin

Griffin v. Consolidated Communications

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 9, 20222:21-cv-00885California6,778 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ----oo0oo---- 11 12 TRICILLA GRIFFIN, individually, No. 2:21-cv-0885 WBS KJN and on behalf of other members 13 of the general public similarly situated and on behalf of other 14 aggrieved employees pursuant to ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION the California Private Attorneys FOR PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF 15 General Act, CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT 16 Plaintiff, 17 v. 18 CONSOLIDATED COMMUNICATIONS, an unknown business entity; and 19 DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 20 Defendant. 21 22 ----oo0oo---- 23 Plaintiff Tricilla Griffin, individually and on behalf 24 of all other similarly situated employees, brought this putative 25 class action against defendant Consolidated Communications 26 alleging wage and hour violations under California law. (See 27 First Am. Compl. (“FAC”) (Docket No. 1-1).) Before the court is 28 plaintiff’s unopposed motion for preliminary approval of a class 1 action settlement. (See Mot. for Prelim. Approval…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.