(SS) Spitzer v. Commissioner of Social Security

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HENRY SPITZER, Case No. 1:17-cv-01736-ADA-CBD

12 Plaintiff,

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

13 v. THAT COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF’S 14 MOTION FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL PURSUANT TO 42 U.S.C. § 406(b) BE 15 SECURITY, GRANTED

16 Defendant. (ECF Nos. 35, 39)

17 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

TWENTY-ONE (21) DAYS

18

19 On July 12, 2022, counsel for Plaintiff Henry Spitzer (“Plaintiff) filed a Motion for 20 Attorneys’ Fees Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). (ECF No. 35). On July 13, 2022, Defendant 21 Commissioner of Social Security (“Defendant”) filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to 22 Plaintiff’s Motion. (ECF No. 37). Accordingly, and for the further reasons set forth below, 23 undersigned recommends that Plaintiff’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees be granted. 24 Procedural and Factual Background 25 On December 5, 2017, Plaintiff and counsel for Plaintiff,…