(SS) Donzell v. Commissioner of Social Security

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ZACHARY DONZELL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00418-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PARTIES’ MOTION TO

REMAND UNDER SENTENCE FOUR OF

13 v. 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), REVERSING FINAL

DECISION AND REMANDING CASE1

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, (Doc. No. 24) 15 Defendant. ORDER MOOTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION 16 FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

17 (Doc. No. 23) 18 19 Pending before the Court is the parties’ joint motion to remand filed November 7, 2022. 20 (Doc. No. 24). Plaintiff Zachary Donzell and the Commissioner of Social Security agree that this 21 case should be remanded for further administrative proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. 22 § 405(g). (Id.). 23 The United States Supreme Court held that the Social Security Act permits remand in 24 conjunction with a judgment either affirming, reversing, or modifying the Secretary’s decision. 25 See Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89,…