(PC)Heredia

(PC)Heredia v. Thomas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20221:22-cv-01439California1,855 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 WILLIAM MARTIN HEREDIA, Case No. 1:22-cv-01439-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER GRANTING 11 PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AN v. AMENDED COMPLAINT 12

J. THOMAS, et al., (ECF No. 1)

13 Defendants. 14

15 16 Plaintiff William Martin Heredia is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 17 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 18 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s complaint, filed November 8, 2022. 19 I. 20 SCREENING REQUIREMENT 21 The Court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a 22 governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). 23 The Court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are 24 legally “frivolous or malicious,” that “fail[] to state a claim on which relief may be granted,” or 25 that “seek[] monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.