Trate

(HC) Barrett v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20221:22-cv-01000California913 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTHONY C. BARRETT, No. 1:22-cv-01000-ADA-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

13 (ECF No. 5) 14 v.

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION FOR WRIT

15 OF HABEAS CORPUS

16 ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

B.M. TRATE, ENTER JUDGMENT AND CLOSE CASE

17 Respondent. ORDER DECLINING TO ISSUE 18 CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

19 20 Petitioner Anthony C. Barrett is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 21 pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was 22 referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 23 302. 24 On August 18, 2022, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations to 25 dismiss the petition for lack of jurisdiction. (ECF No. 5.) Those findings and recommendations 26 were served on all parties with notice that the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.