Great American Ins. Co. v. Paul Blanco's Good Car Co. Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20222:21-cv-00057California1,782 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 GREAT AMERICAN INSURANCE No. 2:21-cv-00057-TLN-DB

COMPANY,

12 Plaintiff, 13 ORDER v. 14

PAUL BLANCO’S GOOD CAR

15 COMPANY SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff Great American Insurance Company’s 19 (“Plaintiff”) Motion for Summary Judgment. (ECF No. 15.) Defendants Paul Blanco’s Good Car 20 Company Sacramento, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Bakersfield, Paul Blanco’s Good Car 21 Company Stockton, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Fresno, Paul Blanco’s Good Car 22 Company Oakland, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Inland Empire, Paul Blanco’s Good Car 23 Company East LA, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Reno, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company 24 Fairfield, Paul Blanco’s Good Car Company Las Vegas, Paul Blanco, and Putu Blanco 25 (collectively, “Defendants”) declined to file an opposition (ECF No. 18), which the Court 26 construes as a non-opposition (ECF No. 19). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS 27 Plaintiff’s motion. 28 ///…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.