Tarpin

(PS) Conerly v. Tarpin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20222:22-cv-01525California845 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CARINA CONERLY, JAMES No. 2:22-cv-01525-TLN-CKD PS CONERLY, and MARYLIN Y. 12 TILLMAN-CONERLY, 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 SHARIF TARPIN, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiffs Carina Conerly, James Conerly, and Marylin Y. Tillman Conerly1 proceed pro 19 se with claims pleaded in a fee-paid complaint filed on August 30, 2022. (ECF No. 1.) Several 20 matters are before the court. As set forth below, the court will vacate the hearing set for 21 November 16, 2022. 22 Motions to Dismiss (ECF Nos. 12, 15) 23 In separate motions filed on October 4, 2022, several defendants moved to dismiss the 24 complaint. (ECF No. 12, Motion to Dismiss by Michelle Cooksey, Heron School, Kerry House,

25 1 Plaintiffs, as non-lawyers, have not established that they can represent the fourth listed plaintiff, M.T., a minor. The general rule is that a parent cannot bring a pro se lawsuit on behalf of a minor. 26 See Johns v. County of San Diego, 114 F.3d 874, 877 (9th Cir. 1997) (“It goes…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.