(PC) Blake v. Roseville Police Dept.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAWNCEY BLAKE, No. 2:22-cv-2009 AC P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

14 ROSEVILLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is a county prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 19 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. Three Strikes Analysis 21 Plaintiff seeks leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). ECF No. 2. 22 The Prison Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (PLRA) permits any court of the United States to 23 authorize the commencement and prosecution of any suit without prepayment of fees by a person 24 who submits an affidavit indicating that the person is unable to pay such fees. However, 25 [i]n no event shall a prisoner bring a civil action or appeal a judgement in a civil action or proceeding under this section if the 26 prisoner has, on 3 or more occasions, while incarcerated or detained in any facility, brought an action or appeal in a court of the…