McComber

(PC) Wheaton v. McComber

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20222:22-cv-01434California1,026 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GENE PAUL WHEATON, Case No. 2:22-cv-01434-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S

APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

12 v. PAUPERIS 13 J. McCROMBER, et al., ECF No. 4 14 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 15 (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT

SUBJECT TO A

16 RECOMMENDATION OF

DISMISSAL;

17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED 18 COMPLAINT 19 ECF No. 1 20 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 22

23 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that fourteen separate defendants violated their1 rights by 24 affixing an “R-Suffix” to their name and by destroying their personal property. The complaint is 25 deficient on two counts. These two claims are insufficiently related to proceed together. 26

27 1 Plaintiff alleges that they are transgender, but does not, as best I can tell, identify what pronouns they…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.