McComber
(PC) Wheaton v. McComber
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 GENE PAUL WHEATON, Case No. 2:22-cv-01434-JDP (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA
12 v. PAUPERIS 13 J. McCROMBER, et al., ECF No. 4 14 Defendants. SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 15 (1) STAND BY HIS COMPLAINT
SUBJECT TO A
16 RECOMMENDATION OF
DISMISSAL;
17 (2) FILE AN AMENDED 18 COMPLAINT 19 ECF No. 1 20 THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE 21 22
23 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, alleges that fourteen separate defendants violated their1 rights by 24 affixing an “R-Suffix” to their name and by destroying their personal property. The complaint is 25 deficient on two counts. These two claims are insufficiently related to proceed together. 26
27 1 Plaintiff alleges that they are transgender, but does not, as best I can tell, identify what pronouns they…