(SS) Hernandez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 10, 20221:21-cv-00036California11,100 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3

4 5

6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIA TERESA HERNANDEZ, No. 1:21-cv-00036-CDB 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF

JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF PLAINTIFF

14 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, acting AND AGAINST DEFENDANT Commissioner of Social Security, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY 15 (Doc. 15) 16 Defendant. 17 18 19 I. Introduction 20 Plaintiff Maria Teresa Hernandez (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of 21 the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying her application 22 for supplemental security income pursuant to Title XVI of the Social Security Act. The matter is 23 before the Court on the parties’ briefs which were submitted without oral argument to the United 24 States Magistrate Judge.1 Docs. 15, 22. After reviewing the record the Court finds that substantial 25 evidence and applicable law do not support the ALJ’s decision. Plaintiff’s appeal is therefore 26 granted. 27

28 1 The parties consented to the jurisdiction of a United States…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.