Harrosh

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 Michael Harrosh, No. 2:21-cv-01969-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Tahoe Regional Planning Agency; George and 15 Virginia Johannessen, 16 Defendants. 17 18 George and Virginia Johannessen obtained approval to build a new pier on their lot on the 19 | west shore of Lake Tahoe. Their neighbor to the south, Michael Harrosh, challenges that 20 | approval in this action, which he filed against the Johannessens and the agency charged with the 21 | approval decision, the Tahoe Regional Planning Agency. The Agency has moved to dismiss. As 22 | explained in this order, that motion is denied. At this early stage of the case, the court cannot 23 | conclude the approval was proper. 24 Harrosh now also moves for a preliminary injunction barring construction of a pier while 25 | this case is pending. He has not shown he will suffer irreparable harm in the absence of an 26 | injunction, a prerequisite to injunctive…