Mohr

(PC) White v. Mohr

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20222:22-cv-00834California2,038 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DELCREE WHITE, Jr., Case No. 2:22-cv-00834-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: 13 v. (1) PROCEED ONLY WITH CLAIMS 14 FOUND COGNIZABLE BELOW, OR SETH MOHR, et al., 15 (2) DELAY SERVING ANY Defendants. DEFENDANT AND FILE AN 16 AMENDED COMPLAINT

17 ECF No. 18 18

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

19 Plaintiff Delcree White, Jr., brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that 20 defendants Mohr and Heinkel used excessive force against him, conducted a strip search in view 21 of female prison staff, kept him standing in a holding cage in mechanical restraints without 22 clothing, and filed a false disciplinary report against him that led to his placement in 23 administrative segregation. ECF No. 18. I dismissed his original complaint for failure to state a 24 claim. ECF No. 15. Plaintiff has filed a first amended…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.