Brunk

(PC) Harris v. Brunk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20221:22-cv-00302California1,129 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARVIN HARRIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00302-AWI-CDB (PC)

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS THIS CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v.

FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH A COURT ORDER AND TO

D. BRUNK, et al.,

PROSECUTE THIS CASE

Defendants. (ECF No. 11)

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

16 Plaintiff Marvin Harris is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On March 15, 2022, Plaintiff initiated this action by filing a complaint asserting a First Amendment retaliation claim against Defendants. (ECF No. 1.) On October 13, 2022, the Court ordered Plaintiff to submit a completed and signed application to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action within thirty days. (ECF No. 11.) The deadline passed, and Plaintiff failed to submit an IFP application or pay the filing fee. The Court advised Plaintiff: “No requests for extension of time will be granted without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.