Roush
Roush v. San Joaquin Valley College, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JENNIFER ROUSH, Case No. 1:21-cv-00556-JLT-BAM
Plaintiff, ORDER VACATING HEARING
v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF
JENNIFER ROUSH’S MOTION TO
SAN JOAQUIN VALLEY COLLEGE, KEN AMEND SCHEDULING ORDER TO GUERRERO and DOES 1 through 30, EXTEND TIME FOR NON-EXPERT inclusive, DISCOVERY
Defendants. (Doc. 20)
Currently before the Court is Plaintiff Jennifer Roush’s (“Plaintiff”) Motion to Amend 19 Scheduling Order to Extend Time for Non-Expert Discovery. (Doc. 20.) Defendants San Joaquin Valley College, Inc. dba San Joaquin Valley College, and Ken Guerrero (“Defendants”) filed an opposition to the motion. (Doc. 24.) No reply was filed within ten 23 days of Defendants’ opposition and the deadline to reply has passed. L.R. 230(d). The Court 24 finds the motion suitable for decision without the need for oral argument. Accordingly, the 25 hearing on the motion currently set for November 18, 2022, is HEREBY…