County of Inyo v. McKinsey and Company, INC.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 14, 20221:22-cv-01340California534 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

eee eee NR EEE OE OS OS OID

UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL

on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: MCKINSEY & COMPANY, INC., NATIONAL

PRESCRIPTION OPIATE CONSULTANT

LITIGATION MDL No. 2996

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —33)

On June 7, 2021, the Panel transferred 17 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 543 F.Supp.3d 1377 (J.P.M.L. 2021). Since that time, 114 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Charles R. Breyer. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Breyer. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.