Rosemary H. Mullins v. County of Fresno

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 ROSEMARY HINOJOSA MULLINS, Case No. 1:21-cv-00405-AWI-SAB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ENTERING STIPULATED

PROTECTIVE ORDER

13 v. (ECF No. 27) 14 COUNTY OF FRESNO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 19 20 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER 21 1. INTRODUCTION 22 1.1 Purposes and Limitations 23 Disclosure and discovery activity in this action are likely to involve production of 24 confidential or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from 25 use for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. 26 Pursuant to Eastern District Local Rule 141.1(c), the parties hereby stipulate to and 27 petition the court to enter the following Stipulated Protective Order. 28 1 1.2 Good Cause Statement 2 Some of the material expected to be exchanged between the parties is information that is 3 not generally available to the public, and that is maintained in confidence by the Producing Party. 4 Special protection from public disclosure…