Alvarez

(PS) Rhee v. Alvarez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20222:18-cv-00105California1,656 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HANNA Q. RHEE, No. 2:18-CV-0105-DAD-DMC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ALEXANDRA M. ALVAREZ, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the 19 Court is the motion to dismiss Plaintiff’s first amended complaint filed by Defendants Medical 20 Board of California, Kimberly Kirchmeyer, Michelle Bholat, Nathan Lavid, Reinhardt Hilzinger, 21 Roberto Moya, Xavier Becerra, Alexandra Alvarez, and Megan O’Carroll (collectively “State 22 Defendants”)1. See ECF No. 61. For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s first amended 23 complaint is deemed withdrawn, State Defendants’ motion to dismiss is stricken, and Plaintiff is 24 directed to file a first amended complaint in accordance with the District Court’s order of March 25 21, 2022. 26 / / / 27 1 Pursuant to the District Judge’s March 21, 2022, order, this action currently 28 proceeds against Defendants Alvarez and Bonta only. See ECF…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.