Montejo

(PC) Stephen v. Montejo

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20222:18-cv-01796California410 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JIMMIE EARL STEPHEN, No. 2:18-cv-1796 KJM DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 E. MONTEJO, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief 18 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided 19 by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On June 29, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were 21 served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings 22 and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. Plaintiff has filed objections to the 23 findings and recommendations, ECF No. 130, and defendant has responded, ECF No. 132. 24 In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Local Rule 304, this 25 court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having reviewed the file, the court finds the 26 findings and recommendations to be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.