Adams

Adams v. City of Redding

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20222:20-cv-01610California3,775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CINDY ADAMS, individually and as No. 2:20-cv-01610-TLN-DMC Personal Representative to the Estate of JESSE ADAMS, Plaintiff, ORDER v. CITY OF REDDING; KYLE CORRIGAN,

CHRISTOPHER STAUP, EDWARD

MCGINNIS, and DOES 4 through 10, Defendants. 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Redding’s (“Defendant”) Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff Cindy Adams (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 31), and Defendant replied (ECF No. 33). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. /// /// /// 26 Plaintiff alleges claims against multiple defendants, but only Defendant City of Redding brings the instant motion to dismiss. However, the Court notes the other named defendants have not filed a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff’s claims arise from the death of Jesse Adams (“Mr. Adams”). (ECF No. 28.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.