Adams
Adams v. City of Redding
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CINDY ADAMS, individually and as No. 2:20-cv-01610-TLN-DMC Personal Representative to the Estate of 12 JESSE ADAMS, 13 Plaintiff, ORDER 14 v. 15 CITY OF REDDING; KYLE CORRIGAN,
CHRISTOPHER STAUP, EDWARD
16 MCGINNIS, and DOES 4 through 10, 17 Defendants. 18 19 This matter is before the Court on Defendant City of Redding’s (“Defendant”) Motion to 20 Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 30.) Plaintiff Cindy Adams (“Plaintiff”) filed an opposition (ECF No. 31), 21 and Defendant replied (ECF No. 33). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES 22 Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss. 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 27 1 Plaintiff alleges claims against multiple defendants, but only Defendant City of Redding brings the instant motion to dismiss. However, the Court notes the other named defendants have 28 not filed a responsive pleading to Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. 1 I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND 2 Plaintiff’s claims arise from the death of Jesse Adams (“Mr. Adams”). (ECF No. 28.) …