Rockwell

Rockwell v. Tuolumne County, California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20221:22-cv-00392California9,577 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 10 ALLAN THOMAS ROCKWELL, Case No. 1:22-cv-00392-JLT-EPG 11 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Plaintiff,

RECOMMENDING THAT DEFENDANT

12

MICHAEL CHOATE’S MOTION TO

13 v. DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART;

DEFENDANT DENISE CHOATE’S MOTION

14 TO DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART; TUOLUMNE COUNTY, et al., 15 DEFENDANTS TUOLUMMNE COUNTY

AND MELISSA BROUHARD’S MOTION TO

16 Defendants. DISMISS BE GRANTED IN PART; AND

THAT DEFENDANTS MICHAEL CHOATE

17 AND DENISE CHOATES’ REQUESTS FOR 18 JUDICIAL NOTICE BE DENIED 19 (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 24). 20 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

21 22 Plaintiff Allan Thomas Rockwell (“Plaintiff”) proceeds pro se in this civil rights action 23 initiated on April 4, 2022. (ECF No. 1). Before the Court are motions to dismiss filed by 24 Defendants Denise Choate, Michael…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.