Conti
Conti v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ANGELA CONTI and JUSTINE MORA, No. 1:19-cv-00769-JLT-SKO individuals, on behalf of themselves and on 10 behalf of all persons similarly situated, ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT
11 Plaintiffs, BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY
WITH THE COURT’S ORDER
12 v.
13 L’OREAL USA S/D INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 14 Defendant. 15 16 On November 7, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of 17 the class settlement and preliminarily approved the proposed Notice Packet. (Doc. 41.) 18 However, there were also revisions required to the Notice Packet, including the date of the 19 hearing for final approval and contact information for ILYM Group as the Settlement 20 Administrator. (See id. at 28.) Therefore, the Court ordered: “the parties SHALL file a 21 finalized Notice with the required revisions for the Court’s approval within seven days of the 22 date of service of this Order.” (Id. at 28, ¶ 13 [emphasis in original].) Pursuant to the…