Conti

Conti v. L'Oreal USA S/D, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 16, 20221:19-cv-00769California505 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 ANGELA CONTI and JUSTINE MORA, No. 1:19-cv-00769-JLT-SKO individuals, on behalf of themselves and on 10 behalf of all persons similarly situated, ORDER TO THE PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

11 Plaintiffs, BE IMPOSED FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY

WITH THE COURT’S ORDER

12 v.

13 L’OREAL USA S/D INC., a Corporation; and DOES 1 through 50, inclusive, 14 Defendant. 15 16 On November 7, 2022, the Court granted Plaintiff’s motion for preliminary approval of 17 the class settlement and preliminarily approved the proposed Notice Packet. (Doc. 41.) 18 However, there were also revisions required to the Notice Packet, including the date of the 19 hearing for final approval and contact information for ILYM Group as the Settlement 20 Administrator. (See id. at 28.) Therefore, the Court ordered: “the parties SHALL file a 21 finalized Notice with the required revisions for the Court’s approval within seven days of the 22 date of service of this Order.” (Id. at 28, ¶ 13 [emphasis in original].) Pursuant to the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.