Vaughan

Vaughan v. Ornales

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20221:20-cv-00941California888 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 J.G., A.G., A.P., and L.P., in each case by Case No. 1:20-cv-00941-JLT-CDB and through their guardian ad litem, Maria 12 Pantoja, individually and as a successor in ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFFS TO interest to Richard Posadas, deceased, and SUBMIT SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING 13 LOURDES VAUGHNAN, individually, ON PETITION FOR COMPROMISE OF

MINORS’ CLAIMS

14 Plaintiffs,

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

15 v. (ECF No. 10) 16 CITY OF ARVIN; KEVIN

ARCHULETA; ALDO ORNALES;

17 PATRICIA STEWART, 18 Defendants. 19 20 On November 11, 2022, plaintiffs J.G., A.G., A.P., and L.P., by and through their 21 guardian ad litem, Maria Pantoja, filed an unopposed Ex Parte Application for Approval of 22 Compromise of the Claims of Minor Plaintiffs. (ECF No. 24.) The petitions addressed the 23 compromise of the minors’ claims under California Rules of Court 7.950 and 7.951 as well as 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c). 25 “District courts have a special duty, derived from Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 17(c), 26 to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.