Jimenez

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARIO JIMENEZ, JR., No. 2:22-cv-01387-MCE-KJN 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 11, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein 18 which were served on the plaintiff. ECF No. 4. No objections have been filed. 19 Accordingly, the Court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. 20 United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are 21 reviewed de novo. See Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 22 (9th Cir. 1983). 23 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause appearing, 24 concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the proposed Findings and Recommendations in full. 25 Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 26 1. The Findings and Recommendations filed October 11, 2022 (ECF No. 4), are 27 ADOPTED in full; 28 2. Plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis…