Doe

Doe v. Blinken

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20222:22-cv-01841California1,100 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 JOHN DOE and JANE DOE, No. 2:22-cv-01841 WBS CKD Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE: PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION

TO PROCEED UNDER PSEUDONYM

ANTONY J. BLINKEN, in his AND REQUEST TO SEAL official capacity as U.S. Secretary of State; JULIE M. STUFFT, in her official capacity as Acting Deputy Assistant Secretary and Managing Director for Visa Services, Bureau of Consular Affairs; JONATHAN K. WEBSTER, in his official capacity as Consul General of the U.S. Embassy Abu Dhabi; and UR MENDOZA JADDOU, in her official capacity as Director of

USCIS,

22 Defendants.

24 ----oo0oo---- 25 This mandamus action seeks to compel defendants to 26 issue a decision on plaintiff Jane Doe’s derivative asylum 27 application. Plaintiffs now move unopposed to proceed under 28 pseudonyms and request to seal a document inadvertently filed with an unredacted name. (Docket Nos. 2, 7.) Rule 10(a) provides that “the complaint must name all…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.