Arellano

Arellano v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20221:22-cv-01147California342 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ALEXANDER ARELLANO, Case No. 1:22-cv-01147-AWI-CDB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO KARIN MAYELAN AND

LIANA TER-OGANESYAN TO SHOW

13 v. CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

BE IMPOSED FOR PRACTICE IN THIS

14 DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC., COURT WITHOUT FIRST SEEKING

ADMISSION

15 Defendant.

SEVEN-DAY DEADLINE

16

17 18 On August 22, 2022, the Clerk of Court directed Plaintiff’s attorneys, Karin Mayelan and 19 Liana Ter-oganesyan to register for admission to this Court. (ECF No. 6.) To date, Attorneys 20 Mayelan and Ter-oganesyan have failed to comply with this direction. 21 Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules 22 or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all 23 sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 24 control its docket and may, in the exercise of that power, impose sanctions where appropriate, 25 including…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.