Pheiffer

(PC) Singh v. Pheiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20221:22-cv-01446California421 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3 4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 MICHAEL MANJEET SINGH, 1:22-cv-01446-GSA-PC

12 ORDER FOR CLERK TO RANDOMLY Plaintiff, ASSIGN UNITED STATES DISTRICT 13 JUDGE TO THIS CASE vs. 14 AND

PHEIFFER, ET AL.,

15 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, Defendants. RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S 16 MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA

PAUPERIS BE DENIED

17 (ECF No. 4.)

18 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN 14 DAYS

19

20 21 I. FINDINGS 22 Michael Manjeet Singh (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil 23 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 9, 2022, Plaintiff filed the Complaint 24 commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) On November 14, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion to 25 proceed in forma pauperis along with a certified copy of his prison trust account, pursuant to 28 26 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 4.) 27 Plaintiff’s trust account…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.