Allison

(HC) Moreno v. Allison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20221:22-cv-00851California515 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2 3 4 5 6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 JESSE MORENO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00851-JLT-EPG-HC

12 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING IN PART

PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR

13 v. EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

OBJECTIONS TO FINDINGS AND

14 KATHLEEN ALLISON, RECOMMENDATION

15 Respondent. (ECF No. 27)

16 17 Petitioner Jesse Moreno is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in a habeas corpus action 18 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. 19 On June 21, 2022, Petitioner filed the instant petition for writ of habeas corpus. (ECF No. 20 1.) On July 12, 2022, the Court ordered Petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be 21 dismissed as unexhausted. (ECF No. 9.) Thereafter, Petitioner filed a motion to disqualify the 22 undersigned, which was denied.1 (ECF Nos. 12, 13.) On August 1, 2022, Petitioner moved to 23 stay the proceedings pursuant to Rhines v. Weber, 544 U.S. 269 (2005), while Petitioner 24 exhausts his remedies in state court. (ECF No. 14.) On August 26, 2022, the undersigned issued 25 findings and recommendation to deny the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.