T.

1 2 3

4

5

6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 CLARENCE LONELL ROBERSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01724-ADA-EPG (PC)

11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT DOE

12 v. DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FROM

THIS ACTION, WITHOUT PREJUDICE,

13 L.T., et al., PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE 4(M)

14 Defendants. (ECF No. 73) 15

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

16 FOURTEEN DAYS 17 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Clarence Lonnell Roberson (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in 20 forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case 21 proceeds on Plaintiff’s Eighth Amendment claims for failure to protect against two Doe 22 sergeants and a Doe lieutenant and for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs against 23 the two Doe sergeants, the Doe lieutenant, and two Doe correctional officers.1 (See ECF Nos. 24 13 & 18). 25 The Doe Defendants have not been served. On May 18, 2022, the…