Perez
(PC) Phelps v. Perez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 PAUL PHELPS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01406-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 11 TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 12 MANUEL PEREZ, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 RECOMMENDING DISMISSAL OF Defendants. CERTAIN CLAIMS 14 (ECF No. 7) 15
16 17 Plaintiff Paul Phelps is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action 18 filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On November 8, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found a cognizable 20 excessive force claim against Defendants Townsend and Bettis in violation of the Fourteenth 21 Amendment, a supervisory liability claim against Defendant Manuel Perez in violation of the 22 Fourteenth Amendment, and a Monell liability claim against the County of Madera in violation 23 of the Fourteenth Amendment. (ECF No. 5.) However, Plaintiff failed to state any other 24 cognizable claims for relief. Plaintiff was…