(PS) Nelson-Rogers v. JP Morgan Chase Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 17, 20222:22-cv-01799California652 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MARY ALICE NELSON ROGERS, No. 2:22–cv–1799–DAD–CKD PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS 13 v. (ECF No. 17) 14 JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, 15 Defendant. 16 17 On October 11, 2022, plaintiff, Mary Alice Nelson Rogers, filed this action seeking to 18 quiet title to her former residence against defendant, JP Morgan Chase Bank. (See ECF No. 1.)

19 I. Factual and Procedural History 20 Plaintiff is a serial litigant who has filed three prior actions arising from foreclosure on her 21 now-former residential mortgage. See 2:21-cv-02151-JAM-KJN; 2:21-cv-1809-JAM-AC; 2:21- 22 cv-1908-JAM-KJN. In October 2021, plaintiff filed three lawsuits in an attempt to remedy the 23 foreclosure; these lawsuits were all dismissed with prejudice. See 2:21-cv-02151-JAM-KJN 24 (dismissing claim to quiet title because plaintiff did not pay her mortgage prevents her from 25 stating a claim to quiet title against JP Morgan Chase); 2:21-cv-1809-JAM-AC; (dismissing for 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.