(PC)Evans
(PC)Evans v. Ourique
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RICHARD A. EVANS, No. 1:22-cv-00026-ADA-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT
PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO PAY FILING
13 v. FEE AND FAILURE TO OBEY COURT
ORDER
14 OURIQUE, et al., (ECF No. 18) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Richard A. Evans (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil 18 rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 On January 6, 2022, the assigned Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 20 recommending that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied because: (1) he 21 is subject to the “three strikes” bar under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g); and (2) the allegations of 22 Plaintiff’s complaint do not satisfy the “imminent danger of serious physical injury” exception to 23 § 1915(g). (ECF No. 6.) The Magistrate Judge also recommended that Plaintiff be ordered to 24 pay the required $402.00 filing fee in full in order to proceed with this action. (Id. at 3.) 25 Following…