(PC)Reynolds

(PC)Reynolds v. Arellano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20221:22-cv-01482California839 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 TYRONE REYNOLDS, Case No. 1:22-cv-01482-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT 11 TO RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT v. JUDGE TO THIS ACTION 12

P. ARELLANO, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

13 RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Defendants. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAPUERIS BE 14 DENIED

15 (ECF No. 2)

16 17 Plaintiff Tyrone Reynolds is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 18 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Plaintiff filed the instant complaint on November 16, 2022, along with a motion to 20 proceed in forma pauperis. (ECF No. 2.) 21 I. 22 LEGAL STANDARD 23 Title 28, United States Code, Section 1915(a)(1) permits a plaintiff to bring a civil action 24 “without prepayment of fees or security thereof” if the plaintiff submits a financial affidavit that 25 demonstrates the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.