Puckett

Puckett v. Dyer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 18, 20221:22-cv-00750California597 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSEPH PUCKETT, Case No. 1:22-cv-00750-ADA-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

13 v. FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE 14 JERRY DYER, ET. AL., 15 Defendants. 16 17 This matter comes before the Court upon periodic review of the file. Plaintiff initiated 18 this action by filing a pro se complaint alleging violations of his Fourth Amendment rights on 19 June 21, 2022. (Doc. No. 1). The complaint names various members of the Fresno City police 20 department, a judge, and the police chief, inter alia. Plaintiff paid the filing fee in full on July 26, 21 2022. (Receipt No. CAE1000050978). The clerk issued summonses on August 26, 2022. (Doc. 22 Nos. 5-6). On November 4, 2022, the summonses were returned as unexecuted. (Docs Nos. 8-9). 23 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m) requires a plaintiff to serve a defendant within 90 days of 24 filing the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m). The time may be extended for good cause shown. Id. 25 If a defendant is not…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.