Trujillo
Trujillo v. Hernandez
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:22-cv-00643-ADA-BAM 12 Plaintiff,
ORDER VACATING DECEMBER 2, 2022
13 v. HEARING 14 ELVIA HERNANDEZ, individually and FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS dba TAQUERIA GUADALAJARA; JOSE REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR 15 OSCAR HERNANDEZ, individually and DEFAULT JUDGMENT (Doc. 11) dba TAQUERIA GUADALAJARA, 16 FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE Defendants. 17
18 19 On September 28, 2022, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed the instant motion for 20 default judgment against Defendants Elvia Hernandez, individually and dba Taqueria 21 Guadalajara, and Jose Oscar Hernandez, individually and dba Taqueria Guadalajara (collectively 22 “Defendants”). (Doc. 11.) No opposition has been filed, and the time in which to do so has 23 passed. L.R. 230(c). The motion was referred to the undersigned pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 24 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The Court finds the matter suitable for decision without oral 25 …