Trate

(HC) Curtis v. Trate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20221:22-cv-00415California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM G. CURTIS, Case No. 1:22-cv-00415-CDB (HC)

Petitioner, ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER’S

PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

v. (ECF Nos. 10, 12) B.M. TRATE, Respondent. 16 Petitioner William G. Curtis, pro se, filed a Petition for Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on April 12, 2022. (ECF. No. 1). On October 27, 2022, Respondent filed a Motion to Dismiss on the grounds that the Court does not have jurisdiction to hear this matter because Petitioner fails to qualify for the “escape hatch” clause of 28 U.S.C. § 2255. See Fed. Rule Civ. P. 12(b)(1), (6), 28 U.S.C. §§ 2241 & 2255(e). (ECF No. 10). On November 14, 2022, Petitioner filed a Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice. (ECF No. 12). Under Rule 41(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, “[A]n action may be dismissed at the plaintiff’s request only by court order, on terms that the court considers proper.” In the Ninth Circuit, district courts are to grant such…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.