Gonzalez

(PC) Figueras v. Gonzalez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 15, 20221:22-cv-01328California619 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RALEIGH R. FIGUERAS, 1:22-cv-01328-SKO (PC) 11 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION

12 v. TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

13 NANCY GONZALEZ, et al., (Doc. 5) 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Raleigh R. Figueras is an immigration detainee proceeding pro se in a civil rights 18 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 10, 2022, Plaintiff filed an application to 19 proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 5.) 20 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the United 21 States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of $350. See 28 22 U.S.C. § 1914(a). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff's failure to prepay the entire fee only 23 if he is granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). See 24 Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007); Rodriguez v. Cook, 169 F.3d 1176, 25 1177 (9th Cir. 1999). However, “[u]nlike other indigent litigants,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.