Marohn

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 NATHAN MAROHN, Case No. 1:22-cv-01070-ADA-SAB

12 Plaintiff, ORDER RESETTING HEARING ON

MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT IN

13 v. CONFORMANCE WITH LOCAL RULES

AND REQUIRING SERVICE ON

14 QINGJUN YU, DEFENDANT WITHIN FIVE DAYS

15 Defendant. (ECF No. 10)

16 17 On November 18, 2022, Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment, setting the hearing 18 before the District Judge on December 5, 2022. (ECF No. 10.) First, pursuant to Local Rule, 19 motions for default judgment brought pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2) are 20 properly set before the assigned Magistrate Judge. See L.R. 302(c)(19). Further, the motion was 21 only set with seventeen (17) days’ notice. The Local Rules require thirty-five (35) days’ notice 22 for all normal civil motions, unless otherwise provided for in the Local Rules. See L.R. 230(b). 23 The Court shall reset the hearing and require that Plaintiff serve the defaulted Defendant at their 24 last known address. While…