Castro

(PC) Williams v. Castro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20221:20-cv-01617California821 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

10 ROBERT CURTIS WILLIAMS, III Case No. 1:20-cv-01617-SAB (PC)

11 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

12 v. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AND

SUA SPONTE GRANTING EXTENSION

13 CASTRO, et al., OF TIME TO FILE MOTIONS FOR

ATTENDANCE OF WITNESSES

14 Defendants. (ECF No. 50) 15

16 17 Plaintiff Robert Curtis Williams, III is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this 18 civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 This case is currently set for jury trial on February 21, 2023. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed 21 November 18, 2022. Plaintiff submits that he was transferred to an outside hospital on June 20, 22 2022, and was discharged on July 27, 2022, and transferred to California Health Care Facility 23 where he is currently housed. As a result, Plaintiff has been without his personal and legal 24 property and has been unable to meet some of the deadlines imposed in the Court’s August 31, 25 2022, trial and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.