(PS) Kan v. Verdera Community Assoc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 21, 20222:22-cv-00348California339 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 | Johnny Kan, No. 2:22-cv-00348-KJM-JDP 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. 14 Verdera Community Association, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 17 The court previously ordered plaintiff Johnny Kan to show cause why this action should 18 | not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. ECF No. 17. The court discharges that order to show 19 | cause after reviewing counsel’s declaration in response. See generally Appelbaum Decl., ECF 20 | No. 18. In the same declaration, counsel requests an extension of time to complete service and to 21 | seek leave to amend his complaint. See Appelbaum Decl. ¥ 5. 22 Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4, the court must dismiss an action without 23 | prejudice if a defendant has not been served within 90 days after a complaint is filed. Fed. R. 24 | Civ. P. 4(m). The court must also, however, “extend the time for service for an appropriate 25 | period,” but only if the plaintiff shows “good…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.