McQuennie

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 STEPHEN MCQUENNIE, Case No. 1:22-cv-00557-JLT-SKO

10 Plaintiff,

ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO

11 v. S AH NO DW G RC AA NU TS IE N, GD E PN LY AI IN NG TI M FFO LT AIO STN S, 12 OPPORTUNITY TO FILE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

13 WELLS FARGO INSTITUTIONAL RETIREMENT SERVICES, et. al., (Docs. 8–12) 14

THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 15 _____________________________________ 16 17 On May 10, 2022, Plaintiff Stephen McQuennie, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, 18 filed an action against Defendants Wells Fargo Institutional Retirement Services and Principal 19 Financial Group. (Doc. 1.) On August 12, 2022, the undersigned issued a screening order finding 20 that Plaintiff failed to state any cognizable claims and advised him that he had two options as to how 21 to proceed: Plaintiff could file either (1) an amended complaint within thirty days, which would be 22 screened in due course; or (2) a statement that he wished to stand on the initial complaint and have 23 it…