Pfeiffer

(PC) Muniz v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaNovember 22, 20221:19-cv-00233California2,456 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CELINA MUNIZ, et al., Case No. 1:19-cv-00233-JLT-CDB

12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 13 v. MOTION FOR DISCOVERY

EXTENSION; GRANTING EXTENSION

14 C. PFEIFFER, et al., IN TIME TO OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 80) 16 17 18 INTRODUCTION 19 This is an action by the estate of Daniel Muniz (the decedent) and his mother Celina 20 Muniz against staff from the Kern Valley State Prison (KVSP). On November 14, 2022, 21 Plaintiffs filed the instant motion seeking a 120-day extension in the time to complete fact 22 discovery, and a corresponding four-month extension in the time to oppose Defendants’ motion 23 for summary judgment. (Doc. 80). In the motion, Plaintiffs first contend that they need 24 additional time to depose two named defendants and a percipient witness. Next, Plaintiffs argue 25 they need additional time to discover the identities of custodial officers who…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.