Romancorrea
Romancorrea v. Superior Court of California, County of Riverside
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO ROMANCORREA, Case No. 1:20-cv-00242-JLT-HBK (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO
DISMISS SECOND AMENDED
13 v. COMPLAINT FOR FAILURE TO STATE A
CLAIM
14 SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA,
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, MR. ALAN FOURTEEN-DAY OBJECTION PERIOD
15 TATE, MR. DAVE MACHER; HON. JUDGE THOMAS KELLY, MR. CATES, (Doc. No. 18) 16 Defendants. 17 18 19 Plaintiff Antonio Romancorrea is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed under 20 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint is before the Court for screening. 21 (Doc. No. 18). For the reasons stated herein, the undersigned recommends the district court 22 dismiss the Second Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. 23 I. BACKGROUND 24 A. Procedural Posture 25 Plaintiff is a state prisoner incarcerated in the California Department of Corrections and 26 Rehabilitation (CDCR) at the California Correctional Institution (CCI) who …