(PC) Gutierrez v. San Joaquin County Jail

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 TOBIAS GUTIERREZ ORNELAS, Case No. 2:22-cv-01435-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

13 v. FAILURE TO PAY THE FILING FEE,

FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, AND FAILURE

14 SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY JAIL, TO COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS 15 Defendant. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

16

17 18 On October 4, 2022, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the $402 filing 19 fee or a complete application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 6. To date, 20 plaintiff has not complied with that order. 21 To manage its docket effectively, the court requires litigants to meet certain deadlines. 22 The court may impose sanctions, including dismissal of a case, for failure to comply with court 23 orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); E.D. Cal. L.R. 110; Hells Canyon Pres. Council 24 v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 1440-41 25 …