McDaniel
McDaniel v. Diaz
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 DAVID MCDANIEL, Case No. 1:20-cv-00856-ADA-SAB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE
COURT TO TERMINATE STANISLAUS
13 v. COUNTY SHERIFF’S DEPARTMENT,
JEFF DIRKSE, JOSE SOUSA, AND HENRY
14 RALPH DIAZ, et al., MENDEZ, AS DEFENDANTS IN THIS
ACTION
15 Defendants. (ECF No. 101) 16 17 On November 22, 202,2 the Plaintiff and the to-be-dismissed Defendants filed a 18 stipulated notice of dismissal pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a) of Defendants 19 Stanislaus County Sheriff’s Department, Jeff Dirkse, Sgt. Jose Sousa, and Henry Mendez. (ECF 20 No. 101.) The dismissal of these Defendants is with prejudice and with each party to bear their 21 own costs and fees. (Id.) The claims against the other named Defendants are not subject to the 22 stipulation and will remain active. (Id.) 23 Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure allows a party to dismiss some or all 24 of the defendants in an action through a Rule 41(a) notice. Wilson v.…